Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Connor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:01, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alice Connor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possibly non-notable actress. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 23:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 23:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 23:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 23:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:29, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:06, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough significant roles in notable productions to pass notability guidelines for actresses.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mild Keep Seems to have enough roles under her belt to pass notability, she would certainly be recognized by a segment of the population based on these roles. Article certainly needs to be beefed up. Oaktree b (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: The subject meets WP:NACTOR, in my opinion, but there doesn't seem to be much by way of significant coverage. This Irish Times article, for example, is essentially just a passing mention: here. Hopefully some further sources can be found. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clarkcj12 (talk) 05:58, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:NACTOR ie. Has had significant roles in multiple shows". Coolabahapple (talk) 01:19, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.